4.5 Article

Identification of auto-antigens in skin scrapings from scabies-infected pigs

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
卷 36, 期 10-11, 页码 1133-1141

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.06.002

关键词

scabies; pigs; Sarcoptes scabiei; auto-antigens; iron binding; transferrin; haptoglobin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sarcoptes scabiei continues to cause, major health and economic problems in a large range of animals and humans.. Although the inflammatory response to the mite and its antigens is known to cause the main pathology, little work has been carried out on this response at the site of infection. This report presents an initial analysis of the proteins found in skin scrapings and their antigenic responsiveness in pigs. Skin scrapings and mite extracts were isolated from chronically infected sows while infected and uninfected sera were isolated from pigs with confirmed infections or mange-free pigs, respectively. Electrophoresis and sequencing confirmed the main components of both the skin and mite extracts to be serum proteins. Immunoblotting then suggested that transferrin was the major antigen recognised by pooled infected sera in the skin and the mite extracts. Immunoassays confirmed that a majority of infected pigs produced antibodies to transferrin while mange-free pigs did not. A pool of IgG from infected dogs was then used to isolate another antigen from pig skin scrapings which was shown to be haptoglobin. This was also found to induce high titres of antibody in infected pigs as compared with mange-free pigs. The use of albumin as a control antigen showed no reactivity in either group of sera. The finding of two iron-binding molecules as strong auto-antigens in pig scabies has implications for the importance; of iron during this infection and may help to explain the persistence and magnitude of the host inflammatory response. (c) 2006 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据