4.5 Article

Deficient alpha-1-antitrypsin phenotypes and persistent airflow limitation in severe asthma

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 100, 期 9, 页码 1534-1539

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.01.009

关键词

severe asthma; persistent airflow limitation; alpha-1-antitrypsin; phenotype

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Persistent airflow limitation is common among patients with severe asthma, but its pathogenesis has not been fully clarified. Severe alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is a risk factor of chronic airflow limitation and emphysema, and partially deficient phenotypes have been associated with an accelerated decline in Lung function. We hypothesized that partial deficiency of AAT (non-PiM AAT phenotype) is a risk factor of persistent airflow Limitation in asthma. Methods: In 122 patients with severe asthma (86 females; age (median (range)): 44.0yr (18-75)) postbronchodilator FEV1 and FEV1/VC were measured and the AAT phenotype was determined. Persistent airflow limitation was defined as postbronchodilator FEV1 or FEV1/VC < 75% pred. with TLC > 75% pred. Results: Six patients (4.9%) had a non-PiM phenotype (1 MF, 3 MS, 1 MZ and 1 SZ). Of the 58 patients with persistent airflow limitation only 1 patient (1.7%) had a non-PiM phenotype vs. 7.8% among the patients without persistent airflow limitation (P = 0.21). Postbronchodilator FEV1/VC (% pred.) was higher in the non-PiM patients than in the PiM patients (P = 0.02), the other lung function parameters were not different. Linear regression analysis showed no association between AAT phenotype and FEV1% predicted (P = 0.26). Conclusions: AAT heterozygoty does not seem to be an important risk factor of persistent airflow limitation in patients with asthma. Although confirmation by longitudinal follow-up studies with larger sample sizes is needed, these results suggest that routine assessment of the AAT phenotype is not indicated in asthmatic patients even if they exhibit fixed airftow limitation. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据