4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Biological hydrogen production from olive mill wastewater with two-stage processes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 1527-1535

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.06.020

关键词

biological hydrogen production; olive mill wastewater; clay treatment; coupled system; photofermentation; dark fermentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work two novel two-stage hydrogen production processes from olive mill wastewater (OMW) have been introduced. The first two-stage process involved dark-fermentation followed by a photofermentation process. Dark-fermentation by activated sludge cultures and photofermentation by Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U.001 were both performed in 55 ml glass vessels, under anaerobic conditions. In some cases of dark-fermentation, activated sludge was initially acclimatized to the OMW to provide the adaptation of microorganisms to the extreme conditions of OMW. The highest hydrogen production potential obtained was 291H(2)/l(OMW) after photofermentation with 50% (v/v) effluent of dark fermentation with activated sludge. Photofermentation with 50% (v/v) effluent of dark fermentation with acclimated activated sludge had the highest hydrogen production rate (0.00811(-1) h(-1)). The second two-stage process involved a clay treatment step followed by photofermentation by R. sphaeroides O.U.001. Photofermentation with the effluent of the clay pretreatment process (4% (v/v)) gives the highest hydrogen production potential (351H(2)/l(OMW)), light conversion efficiency (0.42%) and COD conversion efficiency (52%). It was concluded that both pretreatment processes enhanced the photofermentative hydrogen production process. Moreover, hydrogen could be produced with highly concentrated OMW. Two-stage processes developed in the present investigation have a high potential for solving the environmental problems caused by OMW. (c) 2006 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据