4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

An upwind discretization scheme for the finite volume lattice Boltzmann method

期刊

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
卷 35, 期 8-9, 页码 814-819

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.09.002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fact that the classic lattice Boltzmann method is restricted to Cartesian Grids has inspired several researchers to apply Finite Volume [Nannelli F, Succi S. The lattice Boltzmann equation on irregular lattices. J Stat Phys 1992;68:401-7; Peng G, Xi H, Duncan C, Chou SH. Finite volume scheme for the lattice Boltzmann method on unstructured meshes. Phys Rev E 1999;59:4675-92; Chen H. Volumetric formulation of the lattice Boltzmann method for fluid dynamics: basic concept. Phys Rev E 1998;58:3955-63] or Finite Element [Lee T, Lin CL. A characteristic Galerkin method for discrete Boltzmann equation. J Comp Phys 2001;171:336-56; Shi X, Lin J, Yu Z. Discontinuous Galerkin spectral element lattice Boltzmann method on triangular element. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2003;42:1249-61] methods to the Discrete Boltzmann equation. The finite volume method proposed by Peng et al. works on unstructured grids, thus allowing an increased geometrical flexibility. However, the method suffers from substantial numerical instability compared to the standard LBE models. The computational efficiency of the scheme is not competitive with standard methods. We propose an alternative way of discretizing the convection operator using an upwind scheme, as opposed to the central scheme described by Peng et al. We apply our method to some test problems in two spatial dimensions to demonstrate the improved stability of the new scheme and the significant improvement in computational efficiency. Comparisons with a lattice Boltzmann solver working on a hierarchical grid were done and we found that currently finite volume methods for the discrete Boltzmann equation are not yet competitive as stand alone fluid solvers. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据