4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Regional white matter and neuropsychological functioning across the adult lifespan

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 60, 期 5, 页码 444-453

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.01.011

关键词

normal aging; structural MRI; white matter; cognition; memory; executive functioning

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG024708-1, 5T32AG020498-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [5T32DA13911] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The current study utilized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to more fully elucidate the relationship among age, regional white matter, and neuropsychological functioning. Methods: One hundred ninety-nine neurologically healthy adults received MRI and standardized neuropsychological assessment. MR images were spatially normalized and segmented by tissue hype; relative white matter values in each of the four cerebral lobes in each hemisphere were computed. Subjects were divided into Younger (ages 21-30), Middle (ages 31-54), and Older (ages 55-79) age groups. Results: The Older group had significantly less overall relative white matter than the Middle group, who had significantly less overall relative white matter than the Younger participants (F (2, 193) = 5.42, p = 0.005). Differences in frontal lobe white matter were of largest magnitude, followed by temporal lobe (F (6, 579) = 3.32, p = 0.003). Age and frontal and temporal lobe white matter were primarily associated with performance on neuropsycbological tests of executive functioning and memory. Mediational analysis suggested that frontal lobe white matter mediated the relationship between age and performance on tasks of executive functioning and memory. Conclusions: The results confirm age-associated decline infrontal and temporal white matter, and age-related cognitive decline in several domains. Decline in neuropsychological functioning is, in part, mediated by a relative age-related reduction in frontal white matter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据