4.7 Article

NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle, is a more potent radiosensitising agent compared to free paclitaxel

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 95, 期 5, 页码 601-606

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603311

关键词

paclitaxel; NK105; radiosensitiser; polymer micelle; drug delivery system

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NK105 is a micellar nanoparticle formulation designed to enhance the delivery of paclitaxel (PTX) to solid tumours. It has been reported to exert antitumour activity in vivo and to have reduced neurotoxicity as compared to that of free PTX. The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiosensitising effect of NK105 in comparison with that of PTX. Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)-bearing mice were administered a single intravenous (i.v.) injection of PTX or NK105; 24 h after the drug administration, a proportion of the mice received radiation to the tumour site or lung fields. Then, the antitumour activity and lung toxicity were evaluated. In one subset of mice, the tumours were excised and specimens were prepared for analysis of the cell cycle distribution by flow cytometry. Combined NK105 treatment with radiation yielded significant superior antitumour activity as compared to combined PTX treatment with radiation (P = 0.0277). On the other hand, a histopathological study of lung sections revealed no significant difference in histopathological changes between mice treated with PTX and radiation and those treated with NK105 and radiation. Flow-cytometric analysis showed that NK105-treated LLC tumour cells showed more severe arrest at the G2/M phase as compared to PTX-treated tumour cells. The superior radiosensitising activity of NK105 was thus considered to be attributable to the more severe cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase induced by NK105 as compared to that induced by free PTX. The present study results suggest that further clinical trials are warranted to determine the efficacy and feasibility of combined NK105 therapy with radiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据