4.7 Article

D matrix analysis of the Renner-Teller effect:: An accurate three-state diabatization for NH2

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 125, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2336219

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some time ago we published our first article on the Renner-Teller (RT) model to treat the electronic interaction for a triatomic molecule [J. Chem. Phys. 124, 081106 (2006)]. The main purpose of that Communication was to suggest considering the RT phenomenon as a topological effect, just like the Jahn-Teller phenomenon. However, whereas in the first publication we just summarized a few basic features to support that idea, here in the present article, we extend the topological approach and show that all the expected features that characterize a three (multi) state RT-type'3 system of a triatomic molecule can be studied and analyzed within the framework of that approach. This, among other things, enables us to employ the topological D matrix [Phys. Rev. A 62, 032506 (2000)] to determine, a priori, under what conditions a three-state system can be diabatized. The theoretical presentation is accompanied by a detailed numerical study as carried out for the HNH system. The D-matrix analysis shows that the two original electronic states (2)A(1) and B-2(1) (evolving from the collinear degenerate Pi doublet), frequently used to study this Renner-Teller-type system, are insufficient for diabatization. This is true, in particular, for the stable ground-state configurations of the HNH molecule. However, by including just one additional electronic state-a B state (originating from a collinear Sigma state)-it is found that a rigorous, meaningful three-state diabatization can be carried out for large regions of configuration space, particularly for those, near the stable configuration of NH2. This opens the way for an accurate study of this important molecule even where the electronic angular momentum deviates significantly from an integer value. (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据