4.7 Article

Search for evidence of trend slow-down in the long-term TOMS/SBUV total ozone data record: the importance of instrument drift uncertainty

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 4057-4065

出版社

COPERNICUS PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-4057-2006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have developed a merged ozone data set ( MOD) for the period October 1978 through June 2006 combining total ozone measurements ( Version 8 retrieval) from the TOMS ( Nimbus 7, Earth Probe) and SBUV/SBUV2 ( Nimbus 7, NOAA 9/11/16) series of satellite instruments. We use the MOD data set to search for evidence of ozone recovery in response to the observed leveling off of chlorine and bromine compounds in the stratosphere. A crucial step in any time series analysis is the evaluation of uncertainties. In addition to the standard statistical time series uncertainties, we evaluate the possible instrument drift uncertainty for the MOD data set. We combine these two sources of uncertainty and apply them to a cumulative sum of residuals (CUSUM) analysis for trend slow-down. For the extra-polar mean between 60 degrees S and 60 degrees N, the apparent slow-down in trend is found to be clearly significant if instrument uncertainties are ignored. When instrument uncertainties are added, the slow-down becomes marginally significant at the 2 sigma level. For the mid-latitudes of the northern hemisphere (30 degrees to 60 degrees N) the trend slow-down is highly significant at the 2 sigma level, while in the southern hemisphere the trend slow-down has yet to meet the 2 sigma significance criterion. The rate of change of chlorine/bromine compounds is similar in both hemispheres, and we expect the ozone response to be similar in both hemispheres as well. The asymmetry in the trend slow-down between hemispheres likely reflects the influence of dynamical variability, and thus a clearly statistically significant response of total ozone to the leveling off of chlorine and bromine in the stratosphere is not yet indicated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据