4.6 Article

Transcriptional activation of dehalorespiration - Identification of redox-active cysteines regulating dimerization and DNA binding

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 36, 页码 26382-26390

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M602158200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [1P20RR17675] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans can use chlorinated aromatics including polychlorinated biphenyls as electron acceptors in a process called dehalorespiration. Expression of the cpr gene cluster involved in this process is regulated by CprK, which is a member of the CRP/FNR (cAMP-binding protein/fumarate nitrate reduction regulatory protein) family of helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulators. High affinity interaction of the chlorinated aromatic compound with the effector domain of CprK triggers binding of CprK to an upstream target DNA sequence, which leads to transcriptional activation of the cpr gene cluster. When incubated with oxygen or diamide, CprK undergoes inactivation; subsequent treatment with dithiothreitol restores activity. Using mass spectrometry, this study identifies two classes of redox-active thiol groups that form disulfide bonds upon oxidation. Under oxidative conditions, Cys(105), which is conserved in FNR and most other CprK homologs, forms an intramolecular disulfide bond with Cys(111), whereas an intermolecular disulfide bond is formed between Cys(11) and Cys(200). SDS-PAGE and site-directed mutagenesis experiments indicate that the Cys(11)/Cys(200) disulfide bond links two CprK subunits in an inactive dimer. Isothermal calorimetry and intrinsic fluorescence quenching studies show that oxidation does not change the affinity of CprK for the effector. Therefore, reversible redox inactivation is manifested at the level of DNA binding. Our studies reveal a strategy for limiting expression of a redox-sensitive pathway by using a thiol-based redox switch in the transcription factor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据