4.7 Article

Viral fitness can influence the repertoire of virus variants selected by antibodies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 362, 期 1, 页码 44-54

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.06.077

关键词

viral quasispecies; mutant spectrum; selection dynamics; competition; foot-and-mouth disease virus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Minority genomes in the mutant spectra of viral quasispecies may differ in relative fitness. Here, we report experiments designed to evaluate the contribution of relative fitness to selection by a neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb). We have reconstructed a foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) quasispecies, with two matched pairs of distinguishable mAb-escape mutants as minority genomes of the mutant spectrum. Each mutant of a pair differs from the other by 11-fold or 33-fold in relative fitness. Analysis of the mutant spectra of virus populations selected with different concentrations of antibody in infections in liquid culture medium has documented a dominance of the high fitness counterpart in the selected population. Plaque development as a function of increasing concentration of the antibody has shown that each mutant of a matched pair yielded the same number of plaques, although the high fitness mutant required less time for plaque formation, and attained a larger plaque size at any given time-point. This result documents equal intrinsic resistance to the antibody of each mutant of a matched pair, confirming previous biochemical, structural, and genetic studies, which indicated that the epitopes of each mutant pair were indistinguishable regarding reactivity with the monoclonal antibody. Thus, relative viral fitness can influence in a significant way the repertoire of viral mutants selected from a viral quasispecies by a neutralizing antibody. We discuss the significance of these results in relation to antibody selection, and to other selective forces likely encountered by viral quasispecies in vivo. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据