4.7 Article

Pharmacodynamic studies of gefitinib in tumor biopsy specimens from patients with advanced gastric carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 26, 页码 4309-4316

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2424

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is highly expressed in some gastric cancers and is implicated in cancer cell growth and proliferation. The objective of this study was to assess the in situ biologic activity of the EGFB tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in gastric tumor samples in a phase II study. Methods Patients with previously treated stage IV adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib (250 or 500 mg/d). Tumor biopsies, obtained at screening and on day 28 of treatment, were assessed for biomarker expression using immunohistochemistry and analysis of apoptosis. Results One hundred sixteen tumor samples from 70 patients were available, 70 were baseline and 46 were on-therapy biopsies. At baseline, levels of EGFR expression significantly correlated with levels of phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR; P <.001) and Ki67 expression (P =.011), but not with phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase (pMAPK). After gefitinib treatment, levels of pEGFR in tumor cells were significantly reduced (P =.001); this was not the case for pMAPK and phosphorylated Akt (pAkt). However, in some cases gefitinib inhibited pAkt and these tumors had enhanced apoptosis. Likewise, there was a significant correlation between increased exposure to geftinib and enhanced apoptosis. Conclusion Gefitinib reached the tumors at concentrations sufficient to inhibit EGFR activation in advanced gastric carcinoma patients, although this did not translate into clinical benefit. Overall, intratumoral phosphorylation of MAPK and Akt was not significantly inhibited by gefitinib. However, the finding that decreases in pAkt correlated with enhanced apoptosis deserves further exploration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据