4.8 Article

Hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenol in aqueous phase using Pd/AC catalysts prepared with modified active carbon supports

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 67, 期 1-2, 页码 68-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.04.016

关键词

surface oxygen groups; active carbon; palladium catalysts; hydrodechlorination; 4-chlorophenol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydrodechlorination of 4-chlorophenol with hydrogen in aqueous phase has been studied using different home-made Pd/active carbon catalysts. The active carbons employed were subjected to oxidation with nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide and ammonium persulfate and to thermal treatment under nitrogen atmosphere at temperatures ranging from 200 to 900 degrees C in order to modify their surface chemistry. High conversion values for 4-chlorophenol, well above 95%, were obtained working under mild conditions of temperature (50-75 degrees C and pressure (2.4 bar). Modifications on the surface composition of the active carbon support upon oxidation and thermal treatment proved to affect to both conversion of 4-chlorophenol and selectivity towards cyclohexanol, the less toxic product in the reaction pathway. Increasing thermal treatment temperature showed to be detrimental in both respects whereas oxidation with nitric acid favored a higher selectivity to cyclohexanol. Those effects can be attributed more specifically to the relative presence of some oxygen groups on the surface of the support. Thus, the highest 4-chlorophenol conversions were obtained with the catalysts whose supports yielded higher amounts Of CO2 Upon temperature programmed desorption analysis. In particular, carboxylic acid and lactone groups where found to be relevant for a high conversion of 4-chlorophenol and their presence was also important to improve the selectivity to cyclohexanol. The presence of such groups can be related with a more homogeneous distribution of palladium on the catalysts surface. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据