4.7 Article

Synthesis and hemocompatibility of biomembrane mimicing poly( carbonate urethane)s containing fluorinated alkyl phosphatidylcholine side groups

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 2591-2599

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm060375y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we designed and synthesized biomembrane mimicing segmented poly( carbonate urethane)s containing fluorinated alkyl phosphatidylcholine ( PC) side groups. To obtain these novel poly( carbonate urethane) s, a new diol with a long side chain fluorinated alkyl phosphatidylcholine polar headgroup (2-[2-2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9-hexadecafluoro-10- ethoxy-decyloxy-N-(2-hydroxy-1-hydroxymethyl-1-methyl-ethyl)-acetamide] phosphatidylcholine, HFDAPC) was first synthesized and characterized. Then a series of poly( carbonate urethane) s containing fluorinated alkyl phosphatidylcholine side groups were synthesized using methylenebis( phenylene isocyanate) (MDI), poly(1,6-hexyl-1,5-pentyl carbonate) diol (PHPCD), 1,4-butandiol (BDO), and HFDAPC. The obtained fluorinated phosphatidylcholine poly( carbonate urethane) s (FPCPCU) possessed high molecular weight, narrower molecular weight distribution, and good mechanical properties as characterized by GPC and Instron, showing an increased hydrophilicity and a possible arrangement of surface structure as characterized by water contact angle. XPS results indicated that the phosphatidylcholine polar headgroups have been indeed pulled out to the surface with the help of the migration of the fluorinated side chain that was directly connected with the phosphatidylcholine polar headgroup. A preliminary result by protein adsorption and platelet adhesion experiments suggested that only 5 similar to 12.5 mol % phosphatidylcholine could be enough for good hemocompatibility. The current work demonstrates a new synthetic approach that can be used to bring the bioactive PC groups to the surface of the PC-containing polyurethanes more effectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据