4.3 Article

Assessment of the ovine acute phase response and hepatic gene expression in response to Escherichia coli endotoxin

期刊

VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 113, 期 1-2, 页码 113-124

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.04.003

关键词

acute-phase response; hepatic gene expression; lipopolysaccharide; hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; ovine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial membrane endotoxin, induces a systemic inflammatory response (IFR) through the activation of blood monocytes and hepatic kupffer cells. These cells secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines, which subsequently activate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPAA) to release cortisol, an anti-inflammatory hormone that regulates the IFR and subsequent immune response (IR). The intent of this study was to characterize the acute phase response in female sheep challenged systemically with a range of doses of Escherichia coli endotoxin. Yearling ewes were challenged with an i.v. bolus dose of LPS (0, 200, 400, 600 ng/kg BW) and the acute phase response assessed by measuring serum interleukin (IL)-6 and cortisol concentrations, and the febrile response over time. A follow-up liver biopsy study was performed to determine kinetic differences in the expression of eight candidate hepatic genes between LPS dose groups using real-time RT-PCR. The initial time trail did not follow a linear dose response relationship with respect to the febrile and HPAA response to LPS challenge. Serum IL-6 concentrations increased in the two highest treatment groups but did not correlate with the observed febrile and HPAA response. The expression of Toll-like receptor 4, CD 14, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, IL- 1 beta, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD), and tachykinin precursor I hepatic genes was dependent on both the dose and the kinetics of the response to LPS. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据