4.7 Article

Application of factorial design in optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of aluminum in juices and soft drinks

期刊

TALANTA
卷 70, 期 2, 页码 307-314

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2006.02.045

关键词

ultrasonic bath; aluminum; factorial design optimization; electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometer (ETAAS); soft drink; juices

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sample preparation method based on ultrasound-assisted pseudo-digestion of Al from Juices and soft drink samples under ultrasonic effect has been described. A Plackett-Burman experimental design was used as a multivariate strategy for the evaluation of the effects of varying several variables at once. The effects of five different variables preintensification time (without ultrasonic stirring), intensification time in ultrasonic bath (UB), temperature of UB, two acid mixtures (HNO3-H2SO4-H2O2 and HNO3-H2O2), on the recovery of Al have been investigated. From these studies, certain variable showed up as significant, and they were optimized by a using 2(3) + star central composite design, which involved 16 experiments. The best conditions for pseudo-digestion were as follows: a preintensification time 10 min, intensification time 20 min, volume of acid mixtures 3.0 ml and temperature of ultrasonic bath 80 degrees C. A conventional acid digestion on electric hot plate was used to obtain total Al for comparative purpose. Final solutions obtained from both methods, were analysed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Analytical results for the Al by ultrasound-assisted pseudo-digestion, and conventional wet digestion methods showed a good agreement, thus indicating the possibility of using ultrasonic-assisted digestion sample preparation instead of intensive treatments inherent with the acid digestion methods on electric hot plate. The procedure proposed allowed the determination of Al with detection limit (3 alpha/s) 10 mu g l(-1). (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据