4.7 Article

S100P is an early developmental marker of pancreatic carcinogenesis

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 18, 页码 5411-5416

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0298

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Our goal was to clarify the involvement and clinical significance of S100P in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Experimental Design: We examined S100P expression in 45 bulk pancreatic tissues; in microdissected cells, including invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) cells (20 sections), pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) cells (12 sections), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) cells (19 sections), and normal epithelial cells (11 sections); and in pancreatic juice samples from 99 patients with pancreatic diseases (32 cancer, 35 IPMN, and 32 chronic pancreatitis samples). We used quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR with gene-specific priming to measure S100P in these various types of samples. Results: In bulk tissue analyses, pancreatic cancer and IPMN expressed significantly higher levels of S100P than did nonneoplastic pancreas (P < 0.017 and P = 0.0013, respectively). Microdissection analyses revealed that IPMN expressed significantly higher levels of S100P than did IDC (P < 0.0001) and PanIN (P = 0.0031), although S100P expression did not differ between IDC and PanIN (P = 0.077). In pancreatic juice analyses, cancer and IPMN juice expressed significantly higher levels of S100P than did pancreatitis juice (both P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that measurement of S100P in pancreatic juice was Useful for discriminating neoplastic disease from chronic pancreatitis (area under the curve = 0.837; 95% confidence interval, 0.749-0.903). Conclusion: S100P may be an early developmental marker of pancreatic carcinogenesis, and measurement of S100P in pancreatic juice may be useful for early detection of pancreatic cancer or screening of early pancreatic carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据