4.2 Article

Uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors, a clinicopathologic study of six cases

期刊

ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 329-332

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2014.08.009

关键词

Uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors; UTROSCT; Sex cord-like; Endometrial stromal tumor; Gestagen therapy

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [NN407 134 039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors (UTROSCTs) cause difficulties, both with respect to diagnosis as well as to the nomenclature. They belong to the group of low-grade malignant neoplasms, and their clinical course likely depends on the percentage of the sex cord-like component. Morphologically, they can be divided into type land type II with less or more than 50% of sex cord-like areas, respectively. Six patients with an age range of 24 to 63 years underwent the treatment for primary UTROSCT at the Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Poland. between 2000 and 2011. In addition to the surgery, 4 patients were treated with gestagens. Biopsies or excisions from the tumors were examined microscopically and immunohistochemically. Two cases were classified as type I, and 4 cases, as type II tumors. The tumor size ranged from 3 to 24 cm. The sex cord component varied from 25% to 70%. By immunohistochemical examination, the sex cord-like component was calretinin positive, whereas the stromal component was positive for CD10 and negative for h-caldesmon in all the cases studied. In addition, progesterone receptor positivity was found in all the cases, and 4 tumors were positive for smooth muscle actin, cytokeratin AE1/3, and inhibin. No recurrences were noted in any of the 6 patients over 3 to 14.5 years of follow-up period. A correct subclassification of sarcomas of UTROSCT type is of crucial importance because most patients with this rare neoplasm respond well to gestagen therapy and have a good prognosis, compared with other uterine stromal sarcomas. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据