4.7 Article

Optical and infrared diagnostics of SDSS galaxies in the SWIRE survey

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10793.x

关键词

galaxies : elliptical and lenticular,cD; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; infrared : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the rest-frame optical and infrared colours of a complete sample of 1114 z < 0.3 galaxies from the Spitzer Wide-Area Infrared Extragalactic (SWIRE) Legacy Survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We discuss the optical and infrared colours of our sample and analyse in detail the contribution of dusty star-forming galaxies and active galactic nuclei (AGN) to optically selected red sequence galaxies. We propose that the optical (g-r) colour and infrared log(L-24/L-3.6) colour of galaxies in our sample are determined primarily by a bulge-to-disc ratio. The (g-r) colour is found to be sensitive to the bulge-to-disc ratio for disc-dominated galaxies, whereas the log (L-24/L-3.6) colour is more sensitive for bulge-dominated systems. We identify similar to 18 per cent (195 sources) of our sample as having red optical colours and infrared excess. Typically, the infrared luminosities of these galaxies are found to be at the high end of star-forming galaxies with blue optical colours. Using emission-line diagnostic diagrams, 78 are found to have an AGN contribution and 117 are identified as star-forming systems. The red (g-r) colour of the star-forming galaxies could be explained by extinction. However, their high optical luminosities cannot. We conclude that they have a significant bulge component. The number densities of optically red star-forming galaxies are found to correspond to similar to 13 per cent of the total number density of our sample. In addition, these systems contribute similar to 13 per cent of the total optical luminosity density, and 28 per cent of the total infrared luminosity density of our SWIRE/SDSS sample. These objects may reduce the need for 'dry mergers'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据