4.6 Article

Interaction of genome-linked protein (VPg) of turnip mosaic virus with wheat germ translation initiation factors eIFiso4E and eIFiso4F

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 38, 页码 28002-28010

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M605479200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-03037] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between VPg of turnip mosaic virus and wheat germ eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIFiso4E and eIFiso4F ( the complex of eIFiso4E and eIFiso4G) were measured and compared. The fluorescence quenching data showed the presence of one binding site on eIFiso4E for VPg. Scatchard analysis revealed the binding affinity (K-a) and average binding sites (n) for VPg were (8.51 +/- 0.21) x 10(6) M-1 and 1.0, respectively. The addition of eIFiso4G to the eIFiso4E increased the binding affinity 1.5-fold for VPg as compared with eIFiso4E alone. However, eIFiso4G alone did not bind with VPg. The van't Hoff analyses showed that VPg binding is enthalpy-driven and entropy-favorable with a large negative Delta H degrees (-29.32 +/- 0.13 kJmol(-1)) and positive Delta S degrees (36.88 +/- 0.25 Jmol(-1) K-1). A Lineweaver-Burk plot indicates mixed-type competitive ligand binding between VPg and anthraniloyl-7- methylguanosine triphosphate for eIFiso4E. Fluorescence stopped-flow studies of eIFiso4E and eIFiso4F with VPg show rapid binding, suggesting kinetic competition between VPg and m(7)G cap. The VPg protein binds much faster than cap analogs. The activation energies for binding of eIFiso4E and eIFiso4F with VPg were 50.70 +/- 1.27 and 75.37 +/- 2.95 kJmol(-1) respectively. Enhancement of eIFiso4F-VPg binding with the addition of a structured RNA derived from tobacco etch virus suggests that translation initiation involving VPg occurs at internal ribosomal entry sites. Furthermore, the formation of a protein-RNA complex containing VPg suggests the possibility of direct participation of VPg in the translation of the viral genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据