4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Metabolism of endosulfan-α by human liver microsomes and its utility as a simultaneous in vitro probe for CYP2B6 and CYP3A4

期刊

DRUG METABOLISM AND DISPOSITION
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 1779-1785

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.106.010199

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIOSH CDC HHS [OH 07551-ECU] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endosulfan-alpha is metabolized to a single metabolite, endosulfan sulfate, in pooled human liver microsomes ( K-m = 9.8 mu M, V-max = 178.5 pmol/mg/min). With the use of recombinant cytochrome P450 ( P450) isoforms, we identified CYP2B6 ( K-m = 16.2 mu M, V-max = 11.4 nmol/nmol P450/min) and CYP3A4 ( K-m = 14.4 mu M, V-max = 1.3 nmol/nmol P450/min) as the primary enzymes catalyzing the metabolism of endosulfan-alpha, although CYP2B6 had an 8-fold higher intrinsic clearance rate ( CLint = 0.70 mu l/min/pmol P450) than CYP3A4 ( CLint = 0.09 mu l/min/pmol P450). Using 16 individual human liver microsomes ( HLMs), a strong correlation was observed with endosulfan sulfate formation and S-mephenytoin N-demethylase activity of CYP2B6 ( r(2) = 0.79), whereas a moderate correlation with testosterone 6 beta-hydroxylase activity of CYP3A4 ( r(2) = 0.54) was observed. Ticlopidine ( 5 mu M), a potent CYP2B6 inhibitor, and ketoconazole ( 10 mu M), a selective CYP3A4 inhibitor, together inhibited approximately 90% of endosulfan-alpha metabolism in HLMs. Using six HLM samples, the percentage total normalized rate (% TNR) was calculated to estimate the contribution of each P450 in the total metabolism of endosulfan-alpha. In five of the six HLMs used, the percentage inhibition with ticlopidine and ketoconazole in the same incubation correlated with the combined % TNRs for CYP2B6 and CYP3A4. This study shows that endosulfan-alpha is metabolized by HLMs to a single metabolite, endosulfan sulfate, and that it has potential use, in combination with inhibitors, as an in vitro probe for CYP2B6 and 3A4 catalytic activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据