4.3 Review

Clinical applications of circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein biomarkers in cardiovascular disease

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 502-509

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mol.0000245255.40634.b5

关键词

biomarkers; hypercholesterolemia; inflammation; low-density lipoprotein; oxidation; oxidative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review The aim of this article is to review, analyze and interpret the growing body of evidence on circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein and its relationship to diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular disease. Recent findings Previous studies focused on indirect measures of oxidative, stress such as susceptibility of LDL to oxidation and measurement of autoantibodies to oxidized LDL. The generation of monoclonal antibodies recognizing distinct oxidation-specific epitopes has allowed the development of sensitive and specific assays to measure circulating oxidized LDL. Recent work in human populations has demonstrated that circulating oxidized LDL is associated with preclinical atherosclerosis, coronary and peripheral arterial atherosclerosis, acute coronary syndromes and vulnerable plaques. Several studies have also suggested that elevated levels of oxidized LDL are a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular outcomes. In addition, it has been shown that lipoprotein(a) is the primary carrier of oxidized phospholipids in the circulation of humans, suggesting additional mechanisms through which lipoprotein(a) may be pro-atherogenic. Summary Research on circulating oxidized LDL biomarkers is rapidly accelerating and providing novel insights into the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. Future studies will further assess the clinical utility of oxidized LDL biomarkers by determining their prognostic value in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular disease and will also evaluate the relative merit of specific assays by performing comparative studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据