4.3 Article

Relationship between caldera collapse and magma chamber withdrawal: An experimental approach

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2006.05.001

关键词

volcanology; caldera collapse; analogue models; ring faults

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Collapse calderas have received considerable attention due to their link to Earth's ore deposits and geothermal energy resources, but also because of their tremendous destructive potential. Although calderas have been investigated through fieldwork, numerical models and experimental studies, some important aspects on their formation still remain poorly understood. One key issue concerns the volume of magmas involved in caldera-forming eruptions. We perform analogue experiments to correlate the structural evolution of a collapse with the erupted magma chamber volume fraction. The experimental device consists of a transparent box (60 X 60 X 40 cm) filled with dry quartz sand and a water-filled latex balloon as a magma chamber analogue. Evacuation of water through a pipe causes a progressive deflation of the balloon that leads to a collapse of the overlying structure. The experimental design allows to record the temporal evolution of the collapse and to track the evolution of fractures and faults. We study the appearance and development of specific brittle structures, such as surface fractures or internal reverse faults, and correlate each different structure with the corresponding removed magma chamber volume fraction. We also determine the critical conditions for caldera onset. Experimental results show that, at any stage of caldera developments, the experimental relationship between volume fraction and chamber roof aspect ratio fits a logarithmic curve. It implies that volume fractions required to trigger caldera collapse are lower for chambers with low aspect ratios (shallow and wide) than for chambers with high aspect ratios (deep and small). These results are in agreement with natural examples and previous theoretical studies. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据