4.7 Article

Pamidronate reduces bone loss after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 91, 期 10, 页码 3835-3843

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-0684

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Rapid bone loss occurs from the proximal femur after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate effects of high-dose pamidronate therapy on bone loss (BMD) after alloSCT. Design: This was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, 12-month prospective study of iv pamidronate ( 90 mg/month) beginning before conditioning vs. no pamidronate. All 116 patients also received calcitriol (0.25 mu g/d) and calcium ( 1000 mg/d), which were continued for another year. Main Outcome Measures: Primary objectives were to compare changes in BMD 12 months after alloSCT at the femoral neck, lumbar spine, and total hip between the treatment arms and assess influences of glucocorticoid and cyclosporin therapy on these changes. Results: Pamidronate reduced bone loss at the spine, femoral neck, and total hip by 5.6, 7.7, and 4.9% ( all P <= 0.003), respectively, at 12 months. However, BMD of the femoral neck and total hip was still 2.8 and 3.5% lower than baseline, respectively ( P < 0.05) with pamidronate. Only differences at the total hip remained significant between the two groups at 24 months. Benefits were restricted to patients receiving an average daily prednisolone dose greater than 10 mg and cyclosporin therapy for more than 5 months within the first 6 months of alloSCT. Conclusions: Pamidronate markedly reduced but did not completely prevent postallogeneic bone marrow transplantation bone loss. BMD benefits were greatest in patients on higher doses of immunosuppressive therapy, but most were lost 12 months after stopping pamidronate. Studies of more potent bisphosphonates or anabolic therapy with PTH after alloSCT are warranted with the aim of durable maintenance of bone mass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据