4.7 Article

Glycemic index and glycemic load in relation to changes in body weight, body fat distribution, and body composition in adult Danes

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 871-879

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.871

关键词

diet; carbohydrate; obesity; adults; prospective; cohort study; sex differences; glycemic index; glycemic load

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A diet with a high glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) may promote overconsumption of energy and increase the risk of weight gain. Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the relation between GI and GL of habitual diets and subsequent 6-y changes in body weight, body fat distribution, and body composition in a random group of adult Danes. Design: A prospective cohort study was conducted in a subsample of men and women from the Danish arm of the Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease study. The subsample comprised 185 men and 191 women born in 1922, 1932, 1942, or 1952. A baseline health examination and a dietary history interview were carried out in 1987 and 1988; a follow-up health examination was performed in 1993 and 1994. Results: Positive associations between GI and changes in body weight (Delta BW), percentage body fat (Delta%BF), and waist circumference (Delta WC) were observed in women after adjustment for covariates. Significant GI X sex X physical activity interactions for ABW, Delta%BF, and Delta WC were observed, and the associations in the sedentary women were particularly positive. No significant associations with GI were observed in men, and no significant associations with GL were observed in either sex. Conclusions: High-GI diets may lead to increases in BW, body fat mass. and WC in women, especially in sedentary women, which suggests that physical activity may protect against diet-induced weight gain. No associations with GI were observed in men, which suggests sex differences in the association between GI and obesity development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据