4.5 Article

DNA repair gene XRCC3 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 48 case-control studies

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 1136-1144

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201681

关键词

association; meta-analysis; XRCC3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) is a highly suspected candidate gene for cancer susceptibility. However, association studies on the XRCC3 polymorphisms (4541A > G, Thr(241)Met, 17893A > G) in cancer have shown conflicting results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to better assess the purported associations. Forty eight eligible case-control studies including 24 975 cancer patients and 34 209 controls were selected for our meta-analysis. Overall, individuals carrying the XRCC3 Met/Met genotype showed a small cancer risk under a recessive genetic model. The subgroup and meta-regression analysis demonstrated different scenarios concerning the XRCC3 Met/Met genotype's role in cancer susceptibility for different subgroups. Specially, there was a significantly increased risk of breast cancer (OR, 1.14; P = 0.0004; 95% CI, 1.06-1.23; P = 0.37 for heterogeneity), elevated but not significant risk of cancer for head and neck, bladder, surprisingly, a significantly decreased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (OR, 0.76; P = 0.007; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93; P = 0.61 for heterogeneity). A significantly elevated risk of cancer was observed in population-based case-control studies but not in nested or hospital based studies. Similarly, we found a significantly increased risk of cancer for A4541G and a decreased risk for A17893G under dominant genetic models. Our meta-analysis results support that the XRCC3 might represent a low-penetrance susceptible gene especially for cancer of breast, bladder, head and neck, and non-melanoma skin cancer. A single larger study should be required to further evaluate gene-gene and gene environment interactions on XRCC3 polymorphisms and tissue-specific cancer risk in an ethnicity specific population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据