4.1 Article

3D mapping of mini-mental state examination performance in clinical and preclinical Alzheimer disease

期刊

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 224-231

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.wad.0000213857.89613.10

关键词

Alzheimer disease; Mini-mental state examination; MMSE; correlation; cortical atrophy; gray matter atrophy

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [U54 RR021813, RR019771, P41 RR013642] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [K23 AG026803, P50 AG16570] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB01651] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH071940] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NLM NIH HHS [LM05639] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) is a brief cognitive screening instrument frequently used to track Alzheimer disease (AD) progression. We investigated the structural neuroimaging correlates of MMSE performance in patients with clinical and preclinical AD. We analyzed structural magnetic resonance imaging data from 29 probable AD and 5 MCI patients who later converted to probable AD using an advanced 3D cortical mapping technique. MMSE scores were entered as covariates in a general linear model that predicted the gray matter density at each cortical surface point. The results were corrected for multiple comparisons by permutation testing. The global permutation-corrected significance for the maps linking gray matter loss and cognitive decline was P = 0.005 for the left and P = 0.012 for the right hemisphere. Strongest correlations between MMSE score and gray matter integrity precuneus. were seen in the entorhinal. parahippocampal, superior parietal, and subgenual cingulate/orbitofrontal cortices. Significant correlations were also seen bilaterally in the temporal, the middle frontal and the left angular and supramarginal gyri. As a global cognitive measure, MMSE depends on the integrity of widely distributed cortical areas in both brain hemispheres with left-sided predominance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据