4.6 Article

The photometric and kinematic structure of face-on disk galaxies.: I.: Sample definition, Hα integral field spectroscopy, and HI line widths

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
卷 166, 期 2, 页码 505-525

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/506609

关键词

galaxies : kinematics and dynamics; galaxies : spiral; galaxies : structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a survey of the photometric and kinematic properties of 39 nearby, nearly face-on disk galaxies. Our approach exploits echelle-resolution integral-field spectroscopy of the H alpha regions, obtained with DensePak on the WIYN 3.5 m telescope Bench Spectrograph. These data are complemented by H I line profiles observed with the Nancay radio telescope for 25 of these sample galaxies. Twelve additional line widths are available for sample galaxies from the literature. In this paper, we introduce the goals of this survey, define the sample selection algorithm, and amass the integral field spectroscopic data and H I line widths. We establish spatially integrated H alpha line widths for the sample. We test the veracity of these spatially integrated line profiles by convolving narrowband imaging data with velocity field information for one of the sample galaxies, PGC 38268, and also by comparing to H I line profiles. We find H I and H alpha line profiles to be similar in width but different in shape, indicating that we are observing different spatial distributions of ionized and neutral gas in largely axisymmetric systems with flat outer rotation curves. We also find vertical velocity dispersions of the ionized disk gas within several disk scale lengths have a median value of 18 km s(-1) and an 80% range of 12-26 km s(-1). This is only a factor of similar to 2 larger than what is observed for neutral atomic and molecular gas. With standard assumptions for intrinsic and thermal broadening for H alpha, this translates into a factor of 3 range in turbulent velocities, between 8 and 25 km s(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据