4.1 Article

Gentamicin ototoxicity: clinical features and the effect on the human vestibulo-ocular reflex

期刊

ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA
卷 126, 期 10, 页码 1057-1061

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00016480600606673

关键词

aminoglycoside; bilateral vestibulopathy; neurophysiology; vestibulopathy; sinusoidal rotational vestibular testing; neurotology

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG09693-10] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC05187-01, DC005224] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [00140-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conclusions. Gentamicin ototoxicity presents with gait imbalance and oscillopsia, but only rarely with hearing loss and vertigo. Sinusoidal rotational stimuli with high accelerations such as the bedside head-thrust test or rotational step changes in velocity are useful to diagnose bilateral vestibulopathy. Objective. To describe the salient clinical features and vestibular testing results in gentamicin ototoxicity. Patients and methods. A retrospective review of the quantitative vestibular function testing results for patients presenting to the UCLA Neurotology Clinic with gentamicin ototoxicity over the past 10 years ( n = 35). Results. All patients presented with imbalance and 33 out of 35 had oscillopsia. Three patients reported a noticeable change in hearing and five reported vertigo. Of the 35 patients, 15 were in renal failure at the time of gentamicin administration. Patients with pre-existing peripheral neuropathy compensated poorly. Sinusoidal rotational testing demonstrated profoundly decreased gain and increased phase lead over the entire frequency range, with a subset of patients having relatively preserved gain at the intermediate frequencies (0.8 - 1.6 Hz) and low acceleration (<30 degrees/s). There was little or no response to high acceleration step changes in velocity. The time constant measured both by sinusoidal and step responses was ultra-low. All patients tested had a positive head-thrust test bilaterally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据