4.7 Article

Group scheduling with group-dependent multiple due windows assignment

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 54, 期 4, 页码 1244-1256

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1058538

关键词

single-machine scheduling; group technology; group-dependent multiple due windows; earliness/tardiness

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [14CGL071]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Foundation of the Ministry of Education [13YJA630034]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR15G010001, LQ15G010001, LR12F02002]
  4. Contemporary Business and Trade Research Center of Zhejiang Gongshang University
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71390334, 61472365]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider single-machine group scheduling with group-dependent multiple due windows assignment. In the group technology environment, the jobs are divided into groups in advance according to their processing similarities, and all the jobs of the same group are processed consecutively in order to improve production efficiency. A sequence-independent machine set-up time precedes the processing of the first job of each group. Each group has group-dependent multiple due windows. The objective is to find the optimal job sequence, the set of jobs assigned to each due window sequence, the optimal group sequence, and the optimal due window assignment to minimise a total cost that comprises the earliness and tardiness penalties and the due window starting time and due window size costs. For the case where the number of jobs assigned to each due window in each group is given in advance, we show that the problem is solvable in O(n log n) time, where n is the total number of jobs. For the case where the number of jobs assigned to each due window in each group is unknown, we give an O(n(B) log n) time algorithm to solve the problem, where B = Max{h(i) - 1} and h(i) is the number of due window of the ith group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据