4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Determinants of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC in chronic spinal cord injury

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.015

关键词

pulmonary disease, chronic obstruction; pulmonary function tests; quadriplegia; rehabilitation; spinal cord injuries

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD042141, R01 HD42141] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess factors that influence pulmonary function, because respiratory system dysfunction is common in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Setting: Veterans Affairs Boston SCI service and the community. Participants: Between 1994 and 2003, 339 white men with chronic SCI completed a respiratory questionnaire and underwent spirometry. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC. Results: Adjusting for SCI level and completeness, FEV1 (-21.0mL/y; 95% confidence interval [CI], -26.3 to -15.7 mL/y) and FVC (-17.2mL/y; 95% CI, -23.7 to -10.8mL/y) declined with age. Lifetime cigarette use was also associated with a decrease in FEV1 (-3.8mL/pack-year; 95% CI, -6.5 to -1.1 mL/pack-year), and persistent wheeze and elevated body mass index were associated with a lower FEV1/FVC. A greater maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) was associated with a greater FEV1 and FVC. FEV1 significantly decreased with injury duration (-6. 1mL/y; 95% CI, -11.7 to -0.6mL/y), with the greatest decrement in the most neurologically impaired. The most neurologically impaired also had a greater FEV1/ FVC, and their FEV1 and FVC were less affected by age and smoking. Conclusions: Smoking, persistent wheeze, obesity, and MIP, in addition to SCI level and completeness, were significant determinants of pulmonary function. In SCI, FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC may be less sensitive to factors associated with change in airway size and not reliably detect the severity of airflow obstruction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据