4.5 Article

Insulin-like growth factor-1 enhances the efficacy of myoblast transplantation with its multiple functions in the chronic myocardial infarction rat model

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 1253-1262

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.05.012

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Myoblast transplantation (Tx) is promising for the improvement of cardiac function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) has anti-apoptotic and angiogenic effects, and induces myocyte hypertrophy. Our hypothesis is that topical and slow-release IGF-1 enhances the efficacy of Tx through its multiple functions. Methods: Four weeks after coronary artery ligation, Lewis rats were divided into four groups: (1) IGF-1+Tx, injection of 6 x 10(6) myoblasts into the infarcted area with placement of an IGF-1-impregnated sheet on the left ventricular (LV) free wall; (2) Tx, Tx alone; (3) IGF-1, IGF-1 sheet alone; and (4) control. We measured cardiac function and performed immunohistochemical examinations. Results: At 4 weeks after treatment, LV diastolic dimension was the smallest, end-systolic elastance was the highest, and T was the smallest in the IGF-1+Tx group. The graft volume in the IGF-1+Tx group was 3-fold larger than in the Tx group. One day after transplantation, TUNEL-positive donor cells were fewer in the IGF-1+Tx than in the Tx group. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the phosphorylation of Akt increased and the expression of Bax decreased in the transplanted area of IGF-1+Tx rats compared with Tx rats. The vascular density in the peri-infarcted area was larger in IGF-1+Tx than in Tx rats. The mean diameter of graft-derived myotubes was larger in IGF-1+Tx than in Tx animals. Conclusions: IGF-1 increases the graft volume and enhances the efficacy of Tx in the chronic myocardial infarction model due to its multiple effects of preventing apoptosis, inducing angiogenesis, and promoting rnyoblast growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据