4.5 Article

A Non-Invasive Material Characterization Framework for Bioprosthetic Heart Valves

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 97-112

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-018-02129-5

关键词

Inverse finite element simulation; Bioprosthetic heart valves; Three-dimensional anisotropic mechanical properties; Optimization; Fung constitutive model; Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden constitutive model; Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna; Edwards SAPIEN 3; Medtronic CoreValve

资金

  1. American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant [AHA16SDG30920009]
  2. Jazan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computational modeling and simulation has become more common in design and development of bioprosthetic heart valves. To have a reliable computational model, considering accurate mechanical properties of biological soft tissue is one of the most important steps. The goal of this study was to present a non-invasive material characterization framework to determine mechanical propertied of soft tissue employed in bioprosthetic heart valves. Using integrated experimental methods (i.e., digital image correlation measurements and hemodynamic testing in a pulse duplicator system) and numerical methods (i.e., finite element modeling and optimization), three-dimensional anisotropic mechanical properties of leaflets used in two commercially available transcatheter aortic valves (i.e., Edwards SAPIEN 3 and Medtronic CoreValve) were characterized and compared to that of a commonly used and well-examined surgical bioprosthesis (i.e., Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna aortic heart valve). The results of the simulations showed that the highest stress value during one cardiac cycle was at the peak of systole in the three bioprostheses. In addition, in the diastole, the peak of maximum in-plane principal stress was 0.98, 0.96, and 2.95 MPa for the PERIMOUNT Magna, CoreValve, and SAPIEN 3, respectively. Considering leaflet stress distributions, there might be a difference in the long-term durability of different TAV models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据