4.3 Article

Microsurgical anatomy of the hypoglossal nerve

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 841-847

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.12.028

关键词

hypoglossal nerve; microsurgical anatomy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to review the surgical anatomy of the hypoglossal nerve (HN), to reveal its relationships on its course and to provide some landmarks to its identification. Ten cadaveric head dissections (20 sides) were performed using microsurgical techniques. The anatomical relationships between the HN and other nerves, muscles, arteries and veins were carefully recorded, and some measurements were made between the HN and related structures. Thus, various landmarks were determined for the easy identification of the HN. In addition, the hypoglossal triangle, which containes major vascular structures, is described. The HN is divided into three main parts: cisternal. intracanalicular and extracranial. The HN arises from the medulla as a line of rootlets situated along the anterior margin of the lower two-thirds of the olive in the preolivary sulcus. It is the newly described 'hypoglossal' triangle in the anterior neck that is bordered by the descending hypoglossus laterally, transverse hypoglossus inferiorly and inferior border of the stylohyoid muscle superiorly. In our specimens, we determined that the HN was 3-7 mm (mean 5 mm) inferior to the digastric tendon, as well as mostly superficial. The occipital artery arose from the posterior surface of the external carotid artery (ECA) 6-9 mm (mean 7 mm) above the carotid bifurcation. There is also an important 'cross' between the occipital artery and the HN. In all cadavers, this crossing point was 7-9 mm (mean 8 mm) superior to the emergence of the occipital artery from the ECA. In conclusion, understanding the detailed anatomy of the HN and using landmarks to identify the nerve are crucial for surgery in the region. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据