4.5 Article

A Robust 3D Finite Element Simulation of Human Proximal Femur Progressive Fracture Under Stance Load with Experimental Validation

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 41, 期 12, 页码 2515-2527

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0864-9

关键词

Proximal femur; Fracture; Finite element; Experimental validation; Fracture pattern; Force-displacement curve

资金

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR) through TecSan program [ANR-09-TECS-018]
  2. Region Centre (France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical implementation of quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) of proximal femur (hip) fractures requires (i) to develop a bone material behavior able to describe the progressive fracturing process until complete failure of the hip. And (ii) to validate the model with realistic test data that represent typical hip fractures. The objective of the current study was to develop and experimentally validate an accurate 3D finite element (FE) model coupled to a quasi-brittle damage law to simulate human proximal femur fracture considering the initiation and progressive propagation of multiple cracks phases under quasi-static load. The model is based on continuum damage mechanics that can predict hip fracture in more adequate physical terms than criteria-based fracture models. In order to validate the model, ten human proximal femurs were tested until complete fracture under one-legged stance quasi-static load. QCT/FE models were generated and FE simulations were performed on these femurs with the same applied loads and boundary conditions than in the stance experiments. The proposed FE model leads to excellent agreement (R (2) = 0.9432) between predicted and measured results concerning the shape of the force-displacement curve (yielding and fracturing) and the profile of the fractured edge. The motivation of this work was to propose a FE model for possible clinical use with a good compromise between complexity and capability of the simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据