4.5 Article

Measurement of Three-Dimensional Anisotropic Diffusion by Multiphoton Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 555-565

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0939-7

关键词

Multiphoton fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (MP-FRAP); Spatial Fourier analysis (SFA); Anisotropic diffusion; Diffusion tensor; Porcine tendon

资金

  1. NIH [DE021134, DE018741, AR055775]
  2. NSF RII Grant predoctoral fellowship [EPS-0903795]
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The multiphoton fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (MP-FRAP) technique has been developed to measure the three-dimensional (3D) solute diffusion within biological systems. However, current 3D MP-FRAP models are based on isotropic diffusion and spatial domain analysis. The 3D anisotropic diffusion and frequency domain analysis for MP-FRAP measurements are rarely studied. In this study, a new technique is demonstrated for the quantitative and non-destructive determination of 3D anisotropic solute diffusion tensors within biological fibrosis tissues by multiphoton photobleaching and spatial Fourier analysis (SFA). Compared to the spatial domain analysis based MP-FRAP techniques, this SFA-based method has the capability for determining the 3D anisotropic diffusion tensors as well as the flexibility for satisfying initial and boundary conditions. First, a close-form solution of the 3D anisotropic diffusion equation is derived by solely using SFA. Next, this new method is validated by computer-simulated MP-FRAP experiments with pre-defined 3D anisotropic diffusion tensors as well as experimental diffusion measurements of FITC-Dextran (FD) molecules in aqueous glycerol solutions. Finally, this MP-FRAP technique is applied to the measurement of 3D anisotropic diffusion tensors of FD molecules within porcine tendon tissues. This study provides a new tool for complete determination of 3D anisotropic solute diffusion tensor in biological tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据