4.6 Article

Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) is upregulated during scarless wound healing in athymic nude mice

期刊

MATRIX BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 505-514

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2006.07.008

关键词

matrix metalloproteinases; wound healing; regeneration; MMP-9; nude mice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cutaneous wound healing is associated with migratory and remodeling events that require the action of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs). Differences in their expressions were observed during scar-forming and scar-free skin wound healing. We previously found that athymic nude mice are exceptional among mature mammals in their ability to heal injured skin scarlessly. The present study was undertaken to determine whether the modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression during scarless healing in nude mice was different from scar-forming animals. Full thickness skin wounds were made into the back of nude, wild-type controls (C57BL/6J), immunodeficient SCID and Rag, thymectomized neonates and adults, and cyclosporin A treated mice. Post-injured skin tissues were harvested at Day 7 and 24 after injury. Quantitative RT-PCR, Western blot, gelatin zymography and immunohistochemical assays were performed. Our results show that MMP-2 protein was high but similarly expressed in all post-injured animals on Day 7 after injury. Late phase (Day 24) of wound repair was characterized by a decrease in mRNA and protein expression and a decrease in gelatinolytic activity of MMP-2 in all post-injured samples. On the contrary, high (p < 0.001) levels of mRNA expression, prominent pro-and active forms of MMP-9 and cells immunopositive for MMP-9 were present exclusively in the post-injured tissues from nude mice on Day 24 after wounding. This data suggest that MMP-9 expression in the remodeling phase of wound healing in nude mice could be a major component of their ability for scar-free healing. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V./International Society of Matrix Biology. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据