4.5 Article

Inelasticity of Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque

期刊

ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 39, 期 9, 页码 2445-2455

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0331-4

关键词

Mechanical properties; Plastic deformation; Permanent deformation; Stress softening; Plaque; Constitutive model

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [07/RFP/ENMF660]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [07/RFP/ENMF660] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little mechanical test data exists regarding the inelastic behavior of atherosclerotic plaques. As a result finite element (FE) models of stenting procedures commonly use hyperelastic material models to describe the soft tissue response thus limiting the accuracy of the model to the expansion stage of stent implantation and leave them unable to predict the lumen gain. In this study, cyclic mechanical tests were performed to characterize the inelastic behavior of fresh human carotid atherosclerotic plaque tissue due to radial compressive loading. Plaques were classified clinically as either mixed (M), calcified (Ca), or echolucent (E). An approximately linear increase in the plastic deformation was observed with increases in the peak applied strain for all plaque types. While calcified plaques generally appeared stiffest, it was observed that the clinical classification of plaques had no significant effect on the magnitude of permanent deformation on unloading. The test data was characterized using a constitutive model that accounts for both permanent deformation and stress softening to describe the compressive plaque behavior on unloading. Material constants are reported for individual plaques as well as mean values for each plaque classification. This data can be considered as a first step in characterizing the inelastic behavior of atherosclerotic plaques and could be used in combination with future mechanical data to improve the predictive capabilities of FE models of angioplasty and stenting procedures particularly in relation to lumen gain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据