4.7 Article

Formaldehyde in comets C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp), C/2002 T7 (LINEAR), and C/2001 Q4 (NEAT):: Investigating the cometary origin of H2CO

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 649, 期 2, 页码 1169-1177

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/506501

关键词

astrobiology; comets : individual (Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1); NEAT (C/2001 Q4); LINEAR (C/2002 T7)); radio lines : solar system; techniques : interferometric

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Observations of formaldehyde (H2CO) have been conducted toward comets C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp), C/2001 Q4 ( NEAT), and C/2002 T7 (LINEAR) using the Arizona Radio Observatory (ARO) 12 m telescope at 1.2 and 2 mm. Aperture synthesis maps of H2CO at 3 mm were made using the Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Association (BIMA) interferometer toward comet Hale-Bopp. These data indicate that the production rate of H2CO is similar to 3.7; 10(28) s(-1) at similar to 1 AU in comet Hale-Bopp, using a simple Monte Carlo model, if a nuclear origin for the molecule is assumed. However, maps of H2CO in Hale-Bopp, in comparison with CO, show an extended distribution (r(s) similar to 15,000 km) with small-scale structure oriented roughly along the comet-Sun direction. This result suggests a source of H2CO other than the comet nucleus. The extended source of formaldehyde is probably grains composed of a mixture of silicates and organic material. The production rate for H2CO increases to Q similar to 1.4; 10(29) s(-1) assuming such an extended grain source. This value implies a Q/Q(H2O) similar to 1.4%, which is similar to the production rate ratio of Q/Q(H2O) similar to 4% derived from in situ measurements of H2CO in comet Halley. Production rates for H2CO toward comets C/2002 T7 (LINEAR) and C/2001 Q4 ( NEAT) are 1.4; 10(27) and 5.6; 10(26) s(-1), respectively, modeled using the extended grain source. The spectra of H2CO measured toward comet C/2002 T7 (LINEAR) show evidence for a second velocity component, most likely arising from comet fragmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据