4.5 Article

Cathepsins B, L and D in inflammatory bowel disease macrophages and potential therapeutic effects of cathepsin inhibition in vivo

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 146, 期 1, 页码 169-180

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03188.x

关键词

cathepsin B; cathepsin D; cathepsin L; DSS colitis; inflammatory bowel disease; inhibition; macrophages

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cathepsins D (CTSD), B (CTSB) and L (CTSL) are important for the intracellular degradation of proteins. Increased cathepsin expression is associated with inflammatory diseases. We have shown previously an induction of CTSD expression in intestinal macrophages (IMAC) in inflamed mucosa of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here we investigated the regulation of CTSB and CTSL in IMAC during IBD and effects of CTSD and CTSB/CTSL inhibition in vivo. Human IMAC were isolated from normal and inflamed mucosa. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed for CTSB and CTSL mRNA. Immunostaining was used to confirm PCR results. Cathepsin inhibition was investigated in the dextran-sulphate-sodium (DSS) colitis model in mice with application of pepstatin A (CTSD inhibitor), CA-074 (CTSB inhibitor) and Z-Phe-Tyr-aldehyde (CTSL inhibitor). CTSL mRNA was significantly up-regulated in IMAC isolated from IBD mucosa. Up-regulated protein expression was found mainly in areas of mucosal damage by immunostaining. Inhibition of CTSD in mouse DSS colitis was followed by an amelioration of the disease. Inhibitor-treated mice showed a significant lower histological score (HS) and less colon reduction in comparison to controls. Similarly, simultaneous inhibition of CTSB/CTSL was followed by a significant amelioration of colitis. Expression of tissue-degrading cathepsins is increased in IMAC in IBD. Inhibition of CTSD as well as CTSB/CTSL is followed by an amelioration of experimental colitis. The prevention of mucosal damage by cathepsin inhibition could represent a new approach for the therapy of IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据