期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 192, 期 4, 页码 538-540出版社
EXCERPTA MEDICA INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.009
关键词
breast cancer margin assessment; breast cancer positive margins; breast cancer re-excision
类别
Background: We hypothesized that the method of breast cancer margin assessment may be associated with different rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma. Methods: A total of 178 breast cancer specimens were divided into 2 groups (A and B) based on the margin assessment method used. Rates of positive margins, re-excision, and residual carcinoma at re-excision were compared and analyzed statistically. Results: At least I margin was positive in 64.7% in group A and in 65.2% in group B. At directed re-excision 54% in group A and 51% in group B had residual carcinoma. The lateral margin was positive in 44% in group A compared with 26% in group B (P = .06). The posterior margin was positive in 19% in group A and in 51% in group B (P = .001). Conclusions: Two different breast cancer specimen margin assessment methods had comparable rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma at re-excision. Different patterns of specific margin positivity suggest that the method of margin assessment may alter results. (c) 2006 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据