4.4 Article

Expression of betacellulin and epidermal growth factor receptor in hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for angiogenesis

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 37, 期 10, 页码 1324-1332

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.04.022

关键词

carcinoma; hepatocellular neovascularization; pathologic betacellulin receptor; epidermal growth factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is becoming one of the common malignant tumors worldwide and is characterized by high vascularity. Angiogenesis (formation of new microvessels) is critical for growth and progression of various human solid tumors. Betacellulin (BTC) is a member of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family, and its signal action is mediated through EGF receptors (EGFR). In this study, to understand the role of BTC in relation to EGFR in HCC, we examined localization, expression, and involvement in angiogenesis of BTC and EGFR. The results revealed that expression of BTC, EGFR, and tumor growth factor-alpha messenger RNA in HCC was increased by 80%, 60%, and 40%, respectively, as compared with those in the nontumorous tissues. Increased expression of BTC protein was observed in 31 (61%) of 51 HCC specimens, and the level of tumor growth factor a protein was higher in 17 (33%) of 51 HCC specimens than in nonmalignant hepatocytes. Betacellulin was predominantly expressed in HCC cells, whereas EGFR was observed in sinusoidal endothelial cells of HCC in 25 tumors (49%). Betacellullin was secreted in all 4 examined HCC cell lines. The HCC specimens showing positive EGFR expression in tumor endothelial cells had a significantly higher microvessel density than those without EGFR expression (P < .005). A strong correlation was found between BTC expression in cancer cells and EGFR expression in tumor endothelial cells (P < .001). These findings suggest that overexpression of BTC by HCC cells and EGFR by tumor endothelial cells enhance vascularity in a paracrine manner. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据