4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Transcriptome and proteome profiling to understanding the biology of high productivity CHO cells

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 125-140

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/MB:34:2:125

关键词

microarray; proteomics; Chinese hamster ovary; biotherapeutic; transcriptome; proteome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A combined transcriptome and proteome analysis was carried out to identify key genes and proteins differentially expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells producing high and low levels of dhfr-GFP fusion protein. Comparison of transcript levels was performed using a proprietary 15K CHO cDNA microarray chip, whereas proteomic analysis was performed using iTRAQ quantitative protein profiling technique. Microarray analysis revealed 77 differentially expressed genes, with 53 genes upregulated and 24 genes downregulated. Proteomic analysis gave 75 and 80 proteins for the midexponential and stationary phase, respectively. Although there was a general lack of correlation between mRNA levels and quantitated protein abundance, results from both datasets concurred on groups of proteins/genes based on functional categorization. A number of genes (20%) and proteins (45 and 23%) were involved in processes related to protein biosynthesis. We also identified three genes/proteins involved in chromatin modification. Enzymes responsible for opening up chromatin, Hmgn3 and Hmgb1, were upregulated whereas enzymes that condense chromatin, histone H1.2, were downregulated. Genes and proteins that promote cell growth (Igfbp4, Ptma, S100a6, and Lgals3) were downregulated, whereas those that deter cell growth (Ccng2, Gsg2, and S100a 11) were upregulated. Other main groups of genes and proteins include carbohydrate metabolism, signal transduction, and transport. Our findings show that an integrated genomic and proteomics approach can be effectively utilized to monitor transcriptional and posttranscriptional events of mammalian cells in culture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据