4.3 Article

Effect of the mediator in feedback mode-based SECM interrogation of indium tin-oxide and boron-doped diamond electrodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 808-816

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-006-0180-5

关键词

scanning electrochemical microscope; indium tin-oxide; boron-doped diamond; mediator; feedback mode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indium tin-oxide (ITO) and polycrystalline boron-doped diamond (BDD) have been examined in detail using the scanning electrochemical microscopy technique in feedback mode. For the interrogation of electrodes made from these materials, the choice of mediator has been varied. Using Ru(CN)(6(aq))(4), ferrocene methanol (FcMeOH), Fe(CN)(6(aq))(3-) and Ru(NH3)(6(aq))(3+), approach curve experiments have been performed, and for purposes of comparison, calculations of the apparent heterogeneous electron transfer rates (k(app)) have been made using these data. In general, it would appear that values of k(app) are affected mainly by the position of the mediator reversible potential relative to the relevant semiconductor band edge ( associated with majority carriers). For both the ITO ( n type) and BDD ( p type) electrodes, charge transfer is impeded and values are very low when using FcMeOH and Fe(CN)(6(aq))(3-) as mediators, and the use of Ru(NH3)(6(aq))(3+) results in the largest value of k(app). With ITO, the surface is chemically homogeneous and no variation is observed for any given mediator. Data is also presented where the potential of the ITO electrode is fixed using a ratio of the mediators Fe(CN)(6(aq))(_3-) and Fe(CN)(6(aq))(4-), In stark contrast, the BDD electrode is quite the opposite and a range of k(app) values are observed for all mediators depending on the position on the surface. Both electrode surfaces are very flat and very smooth, and hence, for BDD, variations in feedback current imply a variation in the electrochemical activity. A comparison of the feedback current where the substrate is biased and unbiased shows a surprising degree of proportionality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据