4.6 Review

A systematic literature review of the supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model application with special attention to environmental issues

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.08.008

关键词

SCOR model; Supply chain management; Environmental performance; Enterprise engineering

资金

  1. FOGRN-BC [A-32152-004]
  2. PREFORT of Universite Laval (NSERC Discovery Grant) [203193]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Present day concerns with climate change have imposed the consideration of environment-friendly practices as a competitive requisite for supply chains. Consequently, it is increasingly mandatory for business organisations to make a transition toward integrating environmental performance as a constituent element for success. With its GreenSCOR component, the SCOR-model, which is a diagnostic tool for supply chains, can serve as a strategic tool for such environmental performance. However, evidence of environmental considerations in the application of the model within an array of industries in the last decade has not been investigated. This article uses a number of SCOR assessment criteria and elements to review selected SCOR model application papers, published between 2000 and 2012 with special attention to environmental criteria. Results indicate that although the innovative paradigm of moving from single firms to supply chain outfits has been embraced by business organisations, no paper experimented the model based on an end-to-end supply chain approach. While a generally timid interest in GreenSCOR was observed, annual distribution of the articles shows a positive trend in the number of environment and return process related papers. 11.1% of the papers attempted the environmental dimension of the model while 24.4% attempted the return process. The study notes that while the SCOR model is suitable for supply chain financial performance evaluation, it is also a practical decision support tool for environmental assessment and competing decision alternatives along the chain. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据