4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Evaluation of apparent and absolute supraspinatus strength in patients with shoulder injury using the scapular retraction test

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 1643-1647

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0363546506288728

关键词

shoulder examination; scapula; retraction; rotator cuff

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Physical examination of patients with shoulder injury not involving actual rotator cuff tears frequently demonstrates decreased rotator cuff strength on manual muscle testing. This decrease has been attributed to supraspinatus muscle weakness, but it may be owing to alterations in scapular position. Hypothesis: The position of stabilized scapular retraction, by minimizing proximal kinetic chain factors and providing a stable base of muscle origin, positively influences demonstrated supraspinatus strength. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Supraspinatus strength was tested in 20 injured patients and 10 healthy controls in both the empty-can arm position and a position of scapular retraction using a handheld dynamometer. Pain in both maneuvers was measured by use of a visual analog scale. Results: Paired t tests indicated the scapular retraction position resulted in statistically significantly (P =.001) higher supraspinatus strength values within both groups. There was no significant difference between the 2 positions in visual analog scale scores. Conclusion: This study shows that demonstrated apparent supraspinatus weakness on clinical examination,in symptomatic patients may be dependent on scapular position. The weakness may be owing to other factors besides supraspinatus muscle weakness, such as a lack of a stable base in the kinetic chain or scapula. Clinical Relevance: The clinical examination that addresses scapular posture and includes scapular retraction will allow more accurate determination of absolute supraspinatus muscle strength and allow efficacious rehabilitation protocols to address the source of the demonstrated weakness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据