4.5 Article

In vivo activation of human pregnane X receptor tightens the blood-brain barrier to methadone through P-glycoprotein up-regulation

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 70, 期 4, 页码 1212-1219

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.106.023796

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM61191] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ATP-driven drug export pump, P-glycoprotein, is a primary gatekeeper of the blood-brain barrier and a major impediment to central nervous system (CNS) pharmacotherapy. Reducing P-glycoprotein activity dramatically increases penetration of many therapeutic drugs into the CNS. Previous studies in rat showed that brain capillary P-glycoprotein was transcriptionally up-regulated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR), a xenobiotic-activated nuclear receptor. Here we used a transgenic mouse expressing human PXR (hPXR) to determine the consequences of increased blood-brain barrier P-glycoprotein activity. P-glycoprotein expression and transport activity in brain capillaries from transgenic mice was significantly increased when capillaries were exposed to the hPXR ligands, rifampin and hyperforin, in vitro and when the mice were dosed with rifampin in vivo. Plasma rifampin levels in induced mice were comparable with literature values for patients. We also administered methadone, a CNS-acting, P-glycoprotein substrate, to control and rifampin-induced transgenic mice and measured the drug's antinociceptive effect. In rifampin-induced mice, the methadone effect was reduced by approximately 70%, even though plasma methadone levels were similar to those found in transgenic controls not exposed to rifampin. Thus, hPXR activation in vivo increased P-glycoprotein activity and tightened the blood-brain barrier to methadone, reducing the drug's CNS efficacy. This is the first demonstration of the ability of bloodbrain barrier PXR to alter the efficacy of a CNS-acting drug.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据