4.4 Article

CAUSAL GRAPHICAL MODELS IN SYSTEMS GENETICS: A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR JOINT INFERENCE OF CAUSAL NETWORK AND GENETIC ARCHITECTURE FOR CORRELATED PHENOTYPES

期刊

ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 320-339

出版社

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/09-AOAS288

关键词

Causal graphical models; QTL mapping; joint inference of phenotype network and genetic architecture; systems genetics; homogeneous conditional Gaussian regression models; Markov chain Monte Carlo

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK058037, R01 DK058037-10, R01 DK066369-07, R01 DK066369] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM069430-07, R01 GM074244, R01 GM069430, R01 GM074244-08] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Causal inference approaches in systems genetics exploit quantitative trait loci (QTL) genotypes to infer causal relationships among phenotypes. The genetic architecture of each phenotype may be complex, and poorly estimated genetic architectures may compromise the inference of causal relationships among phenotypes. Existing methods assume QTLs are known or inferred without regard to the phenotype network structure. In this paper we develop a QTL-driven phenotype network method (QTLnet) to jointly infer a causal phenotype network and associated genetic architecture for sets of correlated phenotypes. Randomization of alleles during meiosis and the unidirectional influence of genotype on phenotype allow the inference of QTLs causal to phenotypes. Causal relationships among phenotypes can be inferred using these QTL nodes, enabling us to distinguish among phenotype networks that would otherwise be distribution equivalent. We jointly model phenotypes and QTLs using homogeneous conditional Gaussian regression models, and we derive a graphical criterion for distribution equivalence. We validate the QTLnet approach in a simulation study. Finally, we illustrate with simulated data and a real example how QTLnet can be used to infer both direct and indirect effects of QTLs and phenotypes that co-map to a genomic region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据