4.6 Article

Effects of nitric oxide synthases in chronic allergic airway inflammation and remodeling

出版社

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0391OC

关键词

collagen deposition; experimental asthma model; nitric oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The precise role of each nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS) isoform in the pathobiology of asthma is not well established. Our objective was to investigate the contribution of constitutive NO synthase (cNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS) isoforms to lung mechanics and inflammatory and remodeling responses in an experimental model of chronic allergic pulmonary inflammation. Guinea pigs were submitted to seven ovalbumin exposures with increasing doses (1 similar to 5 mg/ml) for 4 wk. The animals received either chronic L-NAME (N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, in drinking water) or 1400W (iNOS-specific inhibitor, intraperitoneal) treatments. At 72 h after the seventh inhalation of ovalbumin solution, animals were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, exhaled NO was collected, and lung mechanical responses were evaluated before and after antigen challenge. Both L-NAME and 1400W treatments increased baseline resistance and decreased elastance of the respiratory system in non-sensitized animals. After challenge, L-NAME increased resistance of the respiratory system and Collagen deposition on airways, and decreased peribronchial edema and mononuclear cell recruitment. Administration of 1400W reduced resistance of the respiratory system response, eosinophilic and mononuclear cell recruitment, and collagen and elastic fibers content in airways. L-NAME treatment reduced both iNOS- and neuronal NOS-positive eosinophils, and 1400W diminished only the number of eosinophils expressing iNOS. In this experimental model, inhibition of NOS-derived NO by L-NAME treatment amplifies bronchoconstriction and increases Collagen deposition. However, blockage of only NOS attenuates bronchoconstriction and inflammatory and remodeling processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据