4.5 Article

Melatonin regulates type 2 deiodinase gene expression in the Syrian hamster

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 147, 期 10, 页码 4680-4687

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2006-0606

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In seasonal species, photoperiod organizes various physiological processes, including reproduction. Recent data indicate that the expression of type 2 iodothyronine deiodinase (Dio2) is modulated by photoperiod in the mediobasal hypothalamus of some seasonal species. Dio2 is believed to control the local synthesis of bioactive T-3 to regulate gonadal response. Here we used in situ hybridization to study Dio2 expression in the hypothalamus of a photoperiodic rodent, the Syrian hamster. Dio2 was highly expressed in reproductively active hamsters in long day, whereas it was dramatically reduced in sexually inhibited hamsters maintained in short day. This contrasted with the laboratory rat, a nonphotoperiodic species, in which no evidence for Dio2 photoperiodic modulation was seen. We also demonstrate that photoperiodic variations of Dio2 expression in hamsters are independent from secondary changes in gonadal steroids. Studies in pinealectomized hamsters showed that the photoperiodic variation of Dio2 expression is melatonin dependent, and injections of long day hamsters with melatonin for only 7 d were sufficient to inhibit Dio2 expression to that of short day levels. Finally, because in some seasonal species thyroid hormones are involved in photorefractoriness, we examined Dio2 expression in short day-refractory hamsters and found that Dio2 mRNA levels remained low despite full reproductive recrudescence. Altogether, these results demonstrate that in the Syrian hamster Dio2 is photoperiodically modulated via a melatonin-dependent process. Furthermore, refractoriness to photoperiod in hamsters appears to occur independently of Dio2. These results raise new perspectives for understanding how thyroid hormones are involved in the control of photoperiodic neuroendocrine processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据