4.7 Article

Oviduct contraction in Drosophila is modulated by a neural network that is both, octopaminergic and glutamatergic

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 209, 期 1, 页码 183-198

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20722

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fertility is a highly complex and regulated phenomenon essential for the survival of any species. To identify Drosophila fertility specific neural networks, we used a GAL4/UAS enhancer trap genetic screen that selectively inactivates groups of neurons. We identified a GAL4 line (bwk(tqs)) that has a female sterile phenotype only when it expresses the tetanus toxin light chain (TeTxLC). These flies lack oviduct contraction, lay almost no eggs, sperm accumulate in the oviducts, and fewer than normal are seen in the storage organs. In insects, two neuroactive substances are important for oviduct contraction: octopamine (OA), a monoamine that inhibits oviduct contraction, and glutamate (Glu), a neurotransmitter that induces contraction. It is known that octoparminergic neurons of the thoracic abdominal ganglion (TAG) modulate oviduct contraction, however, the glutamatergic neurons that innervate the oviduct have not been identified yet and the interaction between these two neuroactive substances is not well understood. Immunostaining experiments revealed that the bwk (tqs), line trapped an octopaminergic neural network that innervates the genital tract. We show that wt like oviduct contraction in TeTxLC-inactivated flies can only be rescued by simultaneous application of Glu and OA suggesting that the abdominal bwk(tqs) neurons are both octopaminergic and glutamatergic, the use of an agonist and an antagonist for Glu receptors as well as their direct visualization confirmed its participation in this phenomenon. Our work provides the first evidence that adult abdominal type 11 visceral innervations co-express Glu and OA and allows us to reevaluate the previous model of neuronal network controlling insect oviduct contraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据